Michael Martin is a professor of philosophy at Boston University. His books include Atheism: A Philosophical Justification (Temple University Press, 1990) and The Case Against Christianity (Temple University Press, 1991). His most recent attack on the Christian faith comes in his article The Transcendental Argument for the Non Existence of God (Autumn 1996, The New Zealand Rationalist).

Below are responses to the works of Michael Martin.

Martin/Frame Online Debate over TANG

• (Exchange #1)
  
  • The Transcendental Argument for the Non Existence of God (1996) (Offsite)
    By: Michael Martin
    This is Martin's article in which attempts to reverse the claims of the transcendental argument given by Reformed apologists. The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God demonstrates God's existence by showing that knowledge itself would be impossible if the Christian God did not exist. Martin sees this claim as reversible and provides herein an article to that effect.
  • A Brief Response to Michael Martin's Transcendental Argument for the Non-Existence of God
    By: John M. Frame
    
• (Exchange #2)
  
  • A Response to John Frame's Rebuttal of The Transcendental Argument for the Non Existence of God (TANG) (Offsite)
    By: Michael Martin
    
  • A Second Response to Martin
    By: John M. Frame
    
• (Exchange #3)
  
  • Response to Frame's Response (Offsite)
    By: Michael Martin
    
  • A Third Response to Martin
    By: John M. Frame
    
• (Exchange #4)
  
  • A Third Response to Frame
    By: Michael Martin
    
  • Frame's Final Response
    By: John M. Frame
    
• (Final Remarks)
  
  • Martin Closes (Offsite)
    By: Michael Martin
    By mutual agreement, Martin has been given the closing word.

• TAG vs. TANG
  By: Michael Butler
  
• Butler's Defense of TAG a nd Critique of TANG (Offsite)
  By: Michael Martin